Overall employee rating

3.0
Based on 77 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
4.0
Job Security
3.0
Pay and benefits
3.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Software Engineer
3.1
11 April 2026
Flexibility is okay, but could be better for engineers.
Pros: I've had some good WFH days, especially during bad weather. As a Software Engineer, the hybrid work model here lets me split time between home and the Austin, TX office. It's not bad if your team is flexible.
Cons: Honestly, it's not truly remote work. You're expected in the office 3 days a week, which can be tough. Sometimes projects need you onsite more, limiting actual work flexibility for software development tasks.
Advice to Management: Consider offering more fully remote positions, especially for senior tech roles, to attract wider talent. The current hybrid model works, but more trust in remote output would be great.
Show more
Junior Software Engineer
3.1
31 March 2026
Decent flexibility if you're proactive
Pros: As a Junior Software Engineer, I've found some decent work flexibility here. My manager is usually fine with WFH a couple of days a week in the Austin office. It's pretty easy to adjust your start time for appointments.
Cons: The official hybrid policy isn't super clear for all engineering roles. Sometimes you feel pressure to be onsite even when it's not strictly required. True remote options aren't really there for new hires in this tech industry company.
Advice to Management: Please clarify the hybrid work policy for all teams. Make remote work a more transparent and accessible option, especially for experienced software development roles, not just senior leadership. This would help with employee retention.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.3
27 March 2026
Decent flexibility for tech roles, but has limits
Pros: I've had pretty good flexibility working in the Seattle office. As a Software Engineer, I get 2-3 WFH days a week, which is a solid hybrid model. It helps a lot with balancing personal stuff and my commute.
Cons: It's not truly flexible though; you still need to be in the office a few set days. The official policy can be rigid, especially for agile development teams who need to coordinate. Can't just decide to work fully remote if you need to.
Advice to Management: Consider allowing more individual team autonomy for WFH schedules. A rigid company-wide hybrid policy doesn't always fit every role or team's needs.
Show more

Latest jobs from BJAK

More jobs
Software Engineer
3.0
1 March 2026
Decent flexibility for engineers in Austin
Pros: The hybrid model works well here. As a Software Engineer, I can usually WFH two days a week from Austin, which is super helpful. That flexible work schedule makes a real difference for personal appointments.
Cons: Sometimes, getting approval for extra remote days can be tough. It feels like some middle managers don't fully get the work from home concept. You still need to be in the Austin office for important sprint meetings, which can limit true flexibility.
Advice to Management: Try to make the hybrid policy more consistent across all engineering teams. Empower managers to trust employees more with their remote work requests.
Show more
Marketing Coordinator
3.1
27 February 2026
Decent hybrid setup for corporate roles
Pros: The hybrid model is pretty solid, usually 3 days in the **Austin office** for **Marketing Coordinator** roles. It's nice to have some **work-from-home** days, which helps avoid the worst traffic. Feels like a good balance for a **mid-sized tech company**.
Cons: Flexibility really depends on your manager; some are stricter about coming in. Full **remote work** isn't an option for most departments, which can be tough. It's not ideal if you need total freedom to work from anywhere.
Advice to Management: Standardize hybrid policies across all teams and consider more remote options for roles that genuinely don't need to be in the office. Manager discretion creates inconsistencies.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.1
25 February 2026
Okay flexibility, but it's team-dependent
Pros: As a Software Engineer in the Austin, TX office, the hybrid model was a solid perk. I could usually pick my WFH days, which made things easier. It's a pretty good setup for balancing life and work.
Cons: Sometimes, work flexibility felt super inconsistent across engineering teams. It really depended on your manager's style. This mid-sized tech company needs more standardized remote options for fairness.
Advice to Management: Try to standardize the work from home and hybrid policies across all engineering teams. It would help a lot with consistency and make it fair for everyone, not just those with flexible managers.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.4
25 February 2026
Hybrid model has pros and cons here
Pros: We get two WFH days a week, which is solid. This hybrid model helps me manage personal stuff, especially as a Software Engineer. The tech industry sometimes demands long hours, so any flexibility is a plus.
Cons: But the onsite requirements can be pretty rigid in the Seattle office. You can't just switch your WFH days if something comes up. It feels like they could offer more autonomy for engineering roles.
Advice to Management: Loosen up on the mandatory in-office days. Trust your teams, especially for technical roles, to get the work done.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.1
23 February 2026
Hybrid setup is okay, could be better
Pros: The hybrid work model is a decent perk, especially for us Software Engineers. I appreciate the ability to work from home a couple days a week, it helps with the Seattle commute. There's some flexibility in daily start times too.
Cons: True work-life balance isn't really there despite the hybrid model. Even with remote options, you're expected to be highly responsive, making it hard to disconnect. It feels like they track your activity too much, which kills trust.
Advice to Management: Trust your employees more with how they manage their WFH time. Reduce the micro-management and focus on results, not hours logged, especially for engineering roles.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.1
5 February 2026
Decent Hybrid Setup for Engineering Roles
Pros: The hybrid model is pretty solid here. We get 2-3 remote days a week, which is good for my commute in Austin traffic. As a Software Engineer, I can get a lot of deep work done from home.
Cons: True flexibility feels limited, though. You're expected to be in the Austin office on specific days, no real choice there. Changing your schedule for personal stuff is tough, even with manager approval. It's not truly flexible if you're in an engineering role.
Advice to Management: Give engineering teams more autonomy over their hybrid schedule. Trust us to manage our workloads. True work flexibility would make a big difference for retention.
Show more
Software Engineer
3.1
30 January 2026
Decent flexibility for a big tech company
Pros: As a Software Engineer, the hybrid model is pretty solid. We get 2-3 days WFH which is great for avoiding the San Francisco commute. It's better than being full onsite, especially for project-based work.
Cons: The WFH days aren't super flexible though. You can't just pick any day; it's set by your team or manager. Sometimes it feels like they track login times for us developers too, which is annoying and stifles true flexibility.
Advice to Management: Trust employees more with choosing WFH days, especially for experienced engineering teams. Less micromanagement on hybrid days would really improve morale.
Show more

See More Companies

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.