Banner image for Macquarie Group

Overall employee rating

3.2
Based on 40 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
4.0
Work flexibility
2.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Financial Analyst
3.0
28 April 2026
Leadership's okay, plenty of learning at Macquarie
Pros: The senior leaders in the investment banking division really know their stuff. You learn a ton about complex deal flow as a financial analyst here. It's a truly global financial institution with great resources.
Cons: Sometimes, leadership's communication could be clearer on project priorities. The pressure for high performance from corporate often trickles down and makes work-life balance tough in the New York office.
Advice to Management: Improve transparency in strategic decision-making and better manage workloads to prevent burnout, especially for junior staff like financial analysts.
Show more
Junior Financial Analyst
2.9
9 April 2026
Solid Pay, Benefits Are Just Okay
Pros: As a Junior Financial Analyst in the NYC office, my starting base salary was pretty decent for a big financial services firm. They paid competitively, which was a relief when I first joined this corporate setting.
Cons: But the overall benefits package wasn't super impressive. Things like health insurance weren't great, and the bonus structure for investment banking roles felt a bit opaque. It's mostly an onsite role, so no big WFH savings on commutes.
Advice to Management: Look at making benefits more competitive, especially for junior staff. Clearer bonus structures for investment banking roles would also help with transparency.
Show more
Financial Analyst
3.1
6 April 2026
Good Start, Slower Growth in Finance
Pros: As a Financial Analyst, you learn a ton about the financial services industry. The training is solid for entry-level folks. Plus, being in the New York City office means you're at the center of things.
Cons: Career progression after a few years isn't always clear. It's really competitive for those mid-level investment banking roles. You can feel a bit stuck without a clear path forward.
Advice to Management: Try to create more transparent career paths and actively mentor employees for internal promotion beyond the junior levels. It would help with retention.
Show more

Latest jobs from Macquarie Group

More jobs
Financial Analyst
3.0
4 April 2026
Decent place for finance, but growth can be slow
Pros: You get good exposure to various financial services projects. The training programs for investment banking analysts are pretty decent, helping you build a solid foundation. It's a stable company in the financial industry, which is nice.
Cons: Career growth feels pretty structured and often slow, especially for entry-level Financial Analyst roles. Promotions aren't always based on merit; sometimes it feels like a waiting game. The hybrid work setup is okay, but true flexibility is rare.
Advice to Management: Focus more on merit-based promotions and clearer career paths for junior staff. It'd help keep people motivated.
Show more
Analyst
3.0
1 April 2026
Leadership is okay, but needs more connection
Pros: My direct VP and Director were really supportive. They'd always take time to explain things, which is huge for an investment banking analyst. You learn a lot in the financial services industry from these specific managers.
Cons: Senior leadership can feel pretty far removed in this big corporate environment. It's tough to get actual face time or even a quick chat. Sometimes decisions from the top feel out of touch with the daily grind, even with our hybrid model.
Advice to Management: Senior leaders should try to connect more directly with junior staff. Even quick, regular check-ins or departmental town halls would help. Make sure decisions are communicated clearly, especially those impacting our hybrid work setup.
Show more
Financial Analyst
3.4
1 April 2026
Hybrid Work Setup is Okay for Analysts
Pros: It's nice that we get a hybrid work option here. Being a Financial Analyst, I appreciate being able to work from home a couple of days a week in the New York City office. It really makes a difference for my commute in this busy corporate setting.
Cons: However, it's not always super flexible. You're still expected to be onsite most of the time, especially if a big project is ramping up. It makes planning personal stuff a bit tricky, and I wouldn't call it truly remote-friendly.
Advice to Management: Consider offering more consistent remote days for roles like Financial Analysts, even during busy periods. Trusting employees more with their schedules would boost morale.
Show more
Analyst
3.3
31 March 2026
Decent Pay, But Benefits Could Be Better
Pros: The base salary for entry-level investment banking roles is pretty solid in the New York City office. I've always felt compensated well for the demanding hours. They do have a decent bonus structure too, which helps.
Cons: The healthcare benefits aren't anything special for a global financial institution. It's tough to justify the out-of-pocket costs sometimes. Also, the 401k match isn't as generous as other firms in the financial services industry.
Advice to Management: Take a look at improving the overall health benefits package. A more competitive 401k match would also go a long way for employees.
Show more
Financial Analyst
3.3
28 March 2026
Hybrid model is fine, but not truly flexible
Pros: Honestly, it's not terrible. We do have a hybrid model for some roles, letting me WFH a couple days a week. For a big financial services firm, that's better than some competitors. It's useful when you need to avoid the commute to the New York City office.
Cons: The "flexibility" isn't always that flexible in practice, especially for us Financial Analyst roles. Leadership really pushes for return-to-office. It's tough to get true work flexibility when your team expects you in more.
Advice to Management: Really listen to feedback on WFH and hybrid policies. Don't just pay lip service to work flexibility, make it actually work for employees.
Show more
Associate Analyst
3.3
27 March 2026
Okay Hybrid, Needs More Trust
Pros: The official hybrid model is decent; we get 2-3 days WFH, which is helpful for personal errands and avoiding the commute to the Sydney office. It's better than full onsite, especially for finance professionals dealing with long hours.
Cons: Flexibility often depends heavily on your team and manager. Some teams are really strict about the 'in-office' days, making it feel less like true work flexibility. There's not much room for fully remote options, which limits talent attraction outside major cities.
Advice to Management: Trust employees more with genuine work flexibility. Consider offering more fully remote positions for certain roles, especially for non-client-facing teams, to attract a wider talent pool. The current hybrid model could be more adaptable.
Show more
Associate, Investment Banking
3.1
16 March 2026
Macquarie Group: Good for Growth, Shaky Security
Pros: The compensation for finance professionals is really good, often better than competitors. You learn a ton fast, working on huge deals across various asset classes.
Cons: Job security isn't always great, especially during market shifts; layoffs definitely happen in investment banking. The work-life balance is also pretty tough, with very long hours expected from Associates.
Advice to Management: Leaders should work on transparent communication regarding market conditions and job outlook. It would really help calm nerves and show commitment to employees beyond just the good times.
Show more

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.