AECOM

Pros: As a Civil Engineer, I've worked on some really interesting infrastructure projects. The corporate environment here means good project stability. You get to learn a lot if you're proactive.
Cons: The pay structure for entry to mid-level engineering roles isn't competitive, especially in a city like Dallas, TX. Benefits are pretty standard; nothing special. I don't feel like raises really keep up with inflation or market rates.
Advice to Management: Re-evaluate salary bands for Civil Engineer roles, especially for those with several years of experience. Invest more in competitive benefits to retain talent.

Pros: I've met some really solid folks here, especially within my direct project teams. It's a huge company, so there's always a new infrastructure project for a Civil Engineer to jump on. The hybrid work model in the Los Angeles office is a big plus for work-life balance.
Cons: The overall company culture feels a bit disconnected and very corporate. It's hard to feel like part of a bigger team sometimes, especially across different departments. The internal bureaucracy can be a real drag for engineering consulting work.
Advice to Management: Try to foster more cross-departmental connections. Break down some of the internal silos to improve collaboration and make people feel more connected within this large corporate structure.

Pros: As a Project Coordinator, I got to work on some pretty cool infrastructure projects. You learn a ton from the senior engineers if you ask questions. It's a solid place to get your foot in the door in the consulting engineering industry.
Cons: After a few years, career growth felt a bit stagnant in the Los Angeles office. Promotions are slow, and it's tough to move up without really pushing hard. It feels very corporate, so don't expect rapid advancement.
Advice to Management: Invest more in formal career pathing and mentorship programs, especially for mid-level employees in large-scale infrastructure projects. Don't just focus on new hires.