Pathways

Pros: I've enjoyed the flexibility of working remote from Seattle. As a Project Coordinator, it's nice to manage my own schedule. There are some internal training programs if you seek them out, which can help with skill development.
Cons: Career progression isn't clear. It feels like you have to constantly advocate for yourself to get promoted. For those in service delivery roles, it's tough to get managers to focus on your development over client demands. Don't expect a clear promotion path unless you push hard.
Advice to Management: Create clearer pathways for career advancement, especially for individual contributors. Invest more in structured mentorship and leadership training. Your Project Coordinators need a tangible path forward, not just a hope.

Pros: It's nice that they have a hybrid model for employees. You can work from home a couple of days a week, which is a solid perk, especially for us in the San Francisco office.
Cons: However, real flexibility for Project Coordinator roles isn't always there. You often have to be onsite for client deliverables, even on WFH days. It feels like they're still figuring out remote work policies.
Advice to Management: Leadership needs to standardize work flexibility policies across all teams. Give Project Coordinators more autonomy on WFH days, especially when not directly meeting clients.

Pros: The base salary for my Project Coordinator role was pretty solid. It's a decent living, especially if you're remote and save on commute costs. The 401k match is also pretty good, can't complain there.
Cons: Health insurance premiums are super high. It really eats into your paycheck, which isn't ideal. Dental and vision coverage isn't great either. Other companies in healthcare tech offer better overall benefits.
Advice to Management: Management should really look into negotiating better health insurance plans. Lower premiums would make a huge difference for employees, especially for remote staff trying to make ends meet.