Banner image for Roche

Overall employee rating

3.3
Based on 37 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
3.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Clinical Research Associate
3.3
10 July 2026

Hybrid model has its good and bad points

Roche is a solid global pharma company with a stable environment, but work flexibility can be hit or miss depending on your team and role.


Pros

I liked the option for a hybrid model; sometimes I could work from home two days a week. For a Clinical Research Associate, that's pretty decent in the pharma industry, especially if you're not always needing to be in the lab. The South San Francisco office is well-equipped for days you are onsite.


Cons

The hybrid policy isn't consistent across all departments. Some teams, particularly those in drug development, still expect almost full-time onsite presence which makes planning tough. It's not truly flexible if your manager dictates every onsite day, even within the hybrid framework.


Advice to Management

Standardize the hybrid work policy across all divisions and roles where it's feasible. True flexibility would boost morale and retain talent, especially in competitive markets like the South San Francisco Bay Area.


Ratings by topic
3.0
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
4.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
3.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture

Similar reviews
Clinical Project Manager
3.3
27 April 2026
Solid pay and benefits for big pharma
Pros: You get a good base salary here, which is pretty solid for a Clinical Project Manager in the Bay Area. The health benefits package is really comprehensive, which helps a lot with healthcare costs. Plus, there's a decent 401k match, standard in the biotech industry.
Cons: While the base pay is good, bonuses aren't always consistent year-to-year across teams. Some of the older plans aren't as competitive as what newer hires get, which is a bit frustrating for long-timers. It's a big corporate environment, so negotiating individual compensation can be tough.
Advice to Management: Re-evaluate bonus structures for more consistency across teams and consider updating older benefit plans to be competitive with what new hires receive. Transparency around compensation bands for roles like Clinical Project Manager would also be helpful.
Show more
Clinical Project Manager
3.6
17 April 2026
Decent WLB for a big pharma company
Pros: I found the hybrid work model really helped. As a Clinical Project Manager, I could juggle my personal life with my responsibilities. The South San Francisco, CA office encourages flexibility for many roles.
Cons: Sometimes, the workload in the biotech industry gets intense. You often have to push past 40 hours during critical study phases. It's not always easy to switch off, even with a hybrid schedule.
Advice to Management: Try to standardize workload expectations across different therapeutic areas. More support during peak times would really help project teams.
Show more
Associate Scientist
3.3
9 April 2026
Hybrid model is okay, but could be better
Pros: The hybrid work model is a decent perk for many roles, especially in the South San Francisco office. It's nice to have some flexibility, not being stuck onsite every single day. For certain lab-based biotech roles, having dedicated WFH days helps with focus.
Cons: Even with the hybrid model, there's still a strict 3-day in-office requirement, which can be tough to juggle sometimes. The flexibility feels a bit limited for an Associate Scientist, especially if your tasks don't always demand lab time. It's not truly agile.
Advice to Management: Consider increasing flexibility for non-lab roles to truly embrace a modern work environment. Trust your teams more with their schedules.
Show more

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.