Banner image for Roche

Overall employee rating

3.3
Based on 37 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
3.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Clinical Trial Manager
3.6
9 December 2025

Solid if you want stability in biotech

Working here, I've always felt a strong sense of job security, which is a huge plus in the biopharmaceutical industry. It's a very stable company, but sometimes that comes with slow decision-making.


Pros

As a Clinical Trial Manager at the South San Francisco office, I've felt pretty secure here. The company's massive presence in the biopharmaceutical industry means there's always a strong pipeline, ensuring job stability. It's a big corporate player, so layoffs aren't a constant worry.


Cons

Sometimes that inherent stability means things move really slow. Decision-making can be a drag, and it's tough to get new initiatives off the ground for various clinical research projects. Innovation sometimes feels stifled by bureaucracy.


Advice to Management

Try to speed up decision processes and empower teams more. Encourage internal mobility and cross-functional projects to keep employees engaged and foster more innovation.


Ratings by topic
3.0
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
4.0
Work flexibility
5.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
3.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture

Similar reviews
Clinical Project Manager
3.3
27 April 2026
Solid pay and benefits for big pharma
Pros: You get a good base salary here, which is pretty solid for a Clinical Project Manager in the Bay Area. The health benefits package is really comprehensive, which helps a lot with healthcare costs. Plus, there's a decent 401k match, standard in the biotech industry.
Cons: While the base pay is good, bonuses aren't always consistent year-to-year across teams. Some of the older plans aren't as competitive as what newer hires get, which is a bit frustrating for long-timers. It's a big corporate environment, so negotiating individual compensation can be tough.
Advice to Management: Re-evaluate bonus structures for more consistency across teams and consider updating older benefit plans to be competitive with what new hires receive. Transparency around compensation bands for roles like Clinical Project Manager would also be helpful.
Show more
Clinical Project Manager
3.6
17 April 2026
Decent WLB for a big pharma company
Pros: I found the hybrid work model really helped. As a Clinical Project Manager, I could juggle my personal life with my responsibilities. The South San Francisco, CA office encourages flexibility for many roles.
Cons: Sometimes, the workload in the biotech industry gets intense. You often have to push past 40 hours during critical study phases. It's not always easy to switch off, even with a hybrid schedule.
Advice to Management: Try to standardize workload expectations across different therapeutic areas. More support during peak times would really help project teams.
Show more
Associate Scientist
3.3
9 April 2026
Hybrid model is okay, but could be better
Pros: The hybrid work model is a decent perk for many roles, especially in the South San Francisco office. It's nice to have some flexibility, not being stuck onsite every single day. For certain lab-based biotech roles, having dedicated WFH days helps with focus.
Cons: Even with the hybrid model, there's still a strict 3-day in-office requirement, which can be tough to juggle sometimes. The flexibility feels a bit limited for an Associate Scientist, especially if your tasks don't always demand lab time. It's not truly agile.
Advice to Management: Consider increasing flexibility for non-lab roles to truly embrace a modern work environment. Trust your teams more with their schedules.
Show more

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.